引用本文
  • 王哲.重新仲裁的适用情形应仅限于程序事项[J].国际商务研究,2015,(4):81-87, 96    [点击复制]
  • WANG Zhe.重新仲裁的适用情形应仅限于程序事项[J].INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RESEARCH,2015,(4):81-87, 96   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1008次   下载 921 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
重新仲裁的适用情形应仅限于程序事项
王哲
0
摘要:
重新仲裁作为司法监督的形式之一,其适用情形应仅限于程序事项。《国际商事仲裁示范法》、英国和美国的立法也将重新仲裁的适用情形主要限定于程序事项。中国仲裁法将国内仲裁案件重新仲裁的适用情形限定于两项关于证据的实体事项,这与仲裁裁决的终局性不符。中国仲裁法应将国内和涉外仲裁案件重新仲裁的适用情形均限定于程序事项。
关键词:  重新仲裁  适用情形  程序事项  司法监督
DOI:
基金项目:上海地方高校大文科学术新人培育计划。
The Applicable Circumstances of Re-Arbitration Shall Be Limited to Procedural Matters
WANG Zhe
Abstract:
Theoretically, the scope of judicial supervision on arbitration shall be limited to procedural matters and public order. Violation of the public order will lead to cancellation of the arbitral awards. Re-arbitration is one form of judicial supervision. Therefore, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration shall be limited to procedural matters. Under UNCITRAL Model Law, English Arbitration Act and Arbitration Act of the United Sates, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration are also mainly limited to procedural matters. Under Chinese law, for domestic arbitration cases, the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration are only limited to two matters related to evidence, which doesn’t conform to the finality of arbitration award. The ideal solution shall make the applicable circumstances of re-arbitration be limited to procedural matters for both domestic cases and foreign cases.
Key words:  re-arbitration  applicable circumstances  procedural matters  judicial supervision

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫
Baidu
map