引用本文
  • 张继红.系统重要性金融机构或有资本问题研究[J].国际商务研究,2016,30(3):58-65    [点击复制]
  • ZHANG Ji-hong.系统重要性金融机构或有资本问题研究[J].INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS RESEARCH,2016,30(3):58-65   [点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 737次   下载 1360 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
系统重要性金融机构或有资本问题研究
张继红
0
摘要:
系统重要性金融机构(SIFIs)倒闭产生的巨大负外部性使得各国在危机处置中更倾向于救助而非任其倒闭,但“太大而不能倒”又会引发道德风险,扭曲公平竞争。国际组织就SIFIs的危机处置提出一系列解决方案及建议,其中自救安排中的或有资本计划作为一项重要的资本工具而广受关注。或有资本不仅具有预防和早期救助、自救之功效,还能有效改善公司治理结构,与《巴塞尔协议II》的三大支柱原则完美契合。但或有资本亦存在不确定性较大、价格变动及成本效用减损等问题,需要结合我国具体的金融市场环境论证、设计、草拟相关规则及配套制度,需要在发行规模、发行程序、转化设计和转化条件等方面谨慎论证、不断完善。
关键词:  或有资本  大而不倒  系统重要性金融机构  自救安排
DOI:
基金项目:司法部专项课题“系统重要性金融机构重整与有序清算法律制度研究”(项目编号:13SFB5036)。
Research on Contingent Capital of Systemically Important Financial Institutions
ZHANG Ji-hong
Abstract:
Given the huge negative externalities resulting in bankruptcy of SIFIs, countries are more inclined to bailout not to leave them to fail. But “too big to fail”may trigger moral hazard and distort fair competition. International organizations have put forward a series of solutions and suggestions about crisis intervention of SIFIs, among which contingent capital project in bail-in arrangement is grabbing great attention as an important capital instrument. Contingent capital doesn’t only have the function of prevention, early rescue and bail-in, but also effectively improves corporate governance structure and perfectly accords with the three pillar principles of Basel Accords II. However, there are also great uncertainty, price fluctuation, cost-effectiveness impairment and other problems in contingent capital. It needs combination with relative specific rules to design and establish the contingent capital system including issuing size, issuing procedure, design and transformation conditions that is fit for China’s financial market environment.
Key words:  contingent capital  too big to fail  SIFI  bail-in arrangement

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫
Baidu
map