| 摘要: |
| 启用外部基准规则的相关问题是中美之间“双反”纠纷的关键问题之一，美国国内立法中关于外部基准的规定早已存在，并为世界其他国家及多边贸易规则所借鉴。美国也已经在对华的“双反”措施中大量使用外部基准，并经常辅以“不利可得事实”证据采信方法以消解外部基准规则的适用障碍。外部基准与替代国价格有明显的区别，但外部基准给中国带来的不利影响较之于替代国价格尤甚，其不仅冲淡了中国在“公共机构”和“重复计算”等问题上所取得的胜利效果，也将使今后中美之间的“双反”纠纷变得更为复杂。中国应尽早重视外部基准问题，从贸易规则、诉讼策略等方面做好充分的应对准备。 |
| 关键词: 补贴利益 价格比较 外部基准 不利可得事实 |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| 美国对华“双反”措施中外部基准规则的适用问题 |
| LI Ben,YAO Yun-can |
|
| Abstract: |
| External Benchmark refers to the importer taking countervailing measures on imported products, use prices of other countries than the surveyed country when calculating the subsidy benefit. This is one of the most important issues in US anti-dumping and countervailing measures against China. Relevant rules already existed in the US domestic legislation and they were referenced by the other countries and multilateral trade rules. Furthermore, External Benchmark has been used against China frequently and often accompanied by“Adverse Facts Available” rules to counteract some obstacles. External Benchmark is markedly different from the“surrogate price”, but adverse effects of External Benchmark to China will be more awful, which dilutes China’s vested achievement among “public body” and “double remedy”, and the problem will be more complicated. China should pay attention to this case as soon as possible and make full preparations. |
| Key words: benefit price comparison external benchmark adverse facts available |
